翻訳と辞書 |
Enderby v Frenchay Health Authority : ウィキペディア英語版 | Enderby v Frenchay Health Authority
''Enderby v Frenchay Health Authority'' (1992) (C-127/92 ) is an EU labour law, relevant for UK labour law, that concerns the justification test for unequal pay between men and women. ==Facts== Dr Pamela Mary Enderby was a speech therapist. She received around 40% less pay than senior hospital pharmacists and clinical psychologists. She said she should have equal pay. Tribunal held the difference came from different bargaining structures of the three professions, which were not in themselves discriminatory. The Employment Appeal Tribunal〔() ICR 382〕 dismissed her appeal. The Court of Appeal made a reference to the ECJ asking whether the separate bargaining structures could be an objective justification under (what is now) TFEU art 157. Also it asked whether it was the case that, ‘if the employer could establish that serious shortages in one of the comparator professions explained part, but not all, of the difference in pay, the whole or only part of that difference should be regarded as justified.’
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』 ■ウィキペディアで「Enderby v Frenchay Health Authority」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|